A public forum for requesting features relating to GRDC's ICT Systems. Please ensure you describe the functionality you want added, and the implication if it is not delivered. The better you describe the request (please include screenshots, etc. where possible), the better able we will be to understand and action your request.

Show not planned All Planned Not planned Completed Answered No status Sort by newest post Newest post Recent activity Votes Comments
Add a subcontracting cost category
We have received a request to update the categories available for Cost Items in budgets: "I think a subcontracting category would be best as you can’t put a figure into the subcontracting sect...
Bob Watson
2 comments -8 votes Not planned
Adding milestones that repeat throughout the project
To easier add milestones that repeat throughout the project, for both internal and external people, can a function be added to say this repeats for 2017, 2018 and 2019, on the same day, and have th...
Melinda Wythes
2 comments 9 votes Not planned
Remove or expand character limits
The text boxes appear to have a maximum word/character limit for responses. This is not ideal as we are trying to respond in full to the criteria. Can the length of these open text boxes be increas...
Bob Watson
3 comments 3 votes Not planned
The system should alert when pasting into a field has truncated text
When copying and pasting into fields on the application form, the system should make it obvious when text has been truncated because of character limits. This is to avoid applicants unexpectly subm...
Bob Watson
2 comments 6 votes Not planned
Please provide examples of completed Reports
Examples of completed reports (milestone and financial) should be provided in order to demonstrate what an 'acceptable' report looks like, as well as providing clearer guidance to allow people repo...
Bob Watson
5 comments 1 vote Not planned
Financial Reporting at a Category, not a line, level
Financial reports will be very cumbersome if reporting is required at a line item level; instead, reporting at a higher level (as per the old Form B) is more appropriate and easier to manage.
Bob Watson
4 comments 5 votes Not planned
Numbering the requests
I suggest requests be numbered to ease reference, such as when a new request is related to an exiting one.
Isa Yunusa
1 comment -4 votes Not planned
Change the language concerning a deed of variation to remove the word deed
Change the language concerning a deed of variation to remove the word deed as this creates extra work for processing.
Paul Alexander
7 comments -8 votes Not planned
To differentiate between a service provider, institution name, contract name, or finance name when applying for procurements through the grains investment portal
To differentiate between a service provider, institution name, contract name, or finance name when applying for procurements through the grains investment portal
Paul Alexander
4 comments -2 votes Not planned
To view and compare the history of variation requests with the original agreement throughout the life of the project in the portal as this would provide me with the necessary transparency to administer the contract
To view and compare the history of variation requests
Paul Alexander
2 comments 8 votes Not planned
More clarification on the variation report due date as it is confusing and there is no guidance on its meaning or context.
Clarification of the variation report due date.
Paul Alexander
2 comments -2 votes Not planned
Track Records
Track Record publications are not indicated on the track record milestones.
Rosie Schocroft
2 comments -6 votes Not planned